Primary study · included by 1 review

A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine with Buccal and Palatal Infiltration of 2% Lignocaine for the Extraction of Maxillary Premolar Teeth.

Sandilya 2019 · Sandilya Vikas, Andrade Neelam Noel, Mathai Paul C, et al. · Contemporary clinical dentistry · 2019

Included by

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Andrade 2019 · Reference 13; Results (studies cited per outcome); Table 1

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD -1.81 [-2.85, -0.78]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD -0.57 [-0.99, -0.16]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic onset time 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD -1.34 [-2.21, -0.47]	7 studies · 705 participants	Low
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD -2.2 [-3.36, -1.03]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD -0.59 [-2.12, 0.95]	4 studies	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.