Primary study · included by 1 review

Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar.

Sharma 2019 · Kumar D Prasanna, Sharma Mandeep, Patil Vinay, et al. · Annals of maxillofacial surgery · 2019

Included by

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Sharma 2019 · Reference 25; Results (studies cited per outcome); Table 1

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD 8.2 [-4.76, 21.16]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16]	4 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16]	4 studies	GRADE not reported
Anesthetic duration 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD 18.68 [3.05, 34.30]	7 studies · 476 participants	Moderate
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia	MD 10.02 [-3.71, 23.74]	2 studies	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.