Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment with clear aligners and fixed appliances: a cone beam computed tomography study.

Li 2020 · Li Yuan, Deng Shiyong, Mei Li, et al. · Progress in orthodontics · 2020

Included by

External Apical Root Resorption Following Orthodontic Treatment with Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Li 2020 · Supplementary Table S4; reference list

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.60 [-0.88, -0.32]5 studies · 333 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.53 [-0.81, -0.25]5 studies · 359 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.52 [-0.81, -0.23]5 studies · 352 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.60 [-0.88, -0.32]5 studies · 333 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.41 [-0.69, -0.13]5 studies · 312 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.41 [-0.69, -0.13]5 studies · 312 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.53 [-0.82, -0.24]5 studies · 282 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.41 [-0.70, -0.12]5 studies · 322 participantsGRADE not reported
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.50 [-0.79, -0.21]6 studies · 392 participantsLow
External apical root resorption: CBCT-based linear root length change (mm)
Clear aligner therapy vs Fixed orthodontic appliances
MD -0.53 [-0.81, -0.25]5 studies · 359 participantsGRADE not reported

2 including reviews in total.