evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Standard vs customized healing abutments with simultaneous bone grafting for tissue changes around immediate implants. 1-year outcomes from a randomized clinical trial.

Perez 2020 · Perez Alexandre, Caiazzo Alfonso, Valente Nicola A, et al. · Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2020

Included by

Impact of an open healing approach on peri-implant mucosa following immediate implant placement with transmucosal provisionalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Perez 2020 · Table 1; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Marginal bone loss
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD 0.14 [-0.32, 0.59]3 studies · 86 participantsGRADE not reported
Midfacial mucosal level (primary outcome)
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD -0.26 [-0.71, 0.18]3 studies · 86 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.