evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

A randomized controlled trial to compare aesthetic outcomes of immediately placed implants with and without immediate provisionalization.

Chan 2019 · Chan Hsun-Liang, George Furat, Wang I-Ching, et al. · Journal of clinical periodontology · 2019

Included by

Impact of an open healing approach on peri-implant mucosa following immediate implant placement with transmucosal provisionalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Chan 2019 · Table 1; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Mesial papilla height
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD 0.76 [0.18, 1.34]2 studies · 50 participantsGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD 0.14 [-0.32, 0.59]3 studies · 86 participantsGRADE not reported
Distal papilla height
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD 0.55 [-0.02, 1.11]2 studies · 50 participantsGRADE not reported
Midfacial mucosal level (primary outcome)
Open healing: immediate transmucosal (non-occlusal) provisionalization with bone grafting, no primary flap closure vs Bone grafting with primary flap closure · 6 to 12 months follow-up
SMD -0.26 [-0.71, 0.18]3 studies · 86 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.