Primary study · included by 1 review

Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: A prospective clinical trial.

Linkevicius 2018 · Linkevicius Tomas, Linkevicius Rokas, Alkimavicius Jonas, et al. · Clinical oral implants research · 2018

Included by

One-year marginal bone loss and survival rate of triangular-neck dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Linkevicius 2018 · Reference list; Table 2; Fig. 3 and Fig. 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Implant survival rate
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Survival rate, non-RCT only, 1 year: certainty Very low3 studiesVery low
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Mean MBL (single-arm) 0.49 [0.43, 0.55]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Mean MBL (single-arm) 0.35 [0.24, 0.46]5 studies · 195 participantsGRADE not reported
Implant survival rate
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Pooled proportion (%) 97.83 [94.72, 99.36]5 studies · 195 participantsGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
MBL, non-RCT only, 1 year, radiographic measurement: certainty Very low3 studiesVery low
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Mean MBL (single-arm) 0.38 [0.21, 0.55]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Mean MBL (single-arm) 0.42 [0.29, 0.55]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Implant survival rate
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Pooled proportion (%) 97.83 [95.36, 99.38]5 studies · 195 participantsGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
MBL, RCT only, 1 year, radiographic measurement: certainty Low2 studiesLow
Implant survival rate
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Survival rate, RCT only, 1 year: certainty Moderate2 studiesModerate
Marginal bone loss at 1 year (mm)
Triangular-neck implants (V3, MIS) vs None (single-arm pooling of triangular-neck implant data) · 1 year
Pooled mean MBL (mm) 0.36 [0.20, 0.52]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Marginal bone loss (mm)
Triangular-neck dental implants (MIS V3) vs None (single-arm pooled data) · 1 year
Mean MBL (single-arm) 0.36 [0.20, 0.52]4 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.