evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.

Revilla-Leon 2018 · Revilla-León M, Olea-Vielba M, Esteso-Saiz A, et al. · The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry · 2018

Included by

The effect of manufacturing technique on marginal gap in inlay, onlay, veneer, and endocrown restorations: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Revilla-Leon 2018 · Table 2; Figure 2; References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Marginal gap (marginal fit)
Milled (subtractive manufactured) restorations vs 3D-printed (additive manufactured) restorations
SMD 0.87 [-0.26, 2.00]9 studies · 298 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.