Primary study · included by 1 review
One-Year Clinical Success of Embrace Hydrophilic and Helioseal-F Hydrophobic Sealants in Permanent First Molars: A Clinical Trial.
Askarizadeh 2017 · Askarizadeh Nahid, Heshmat Haleh, Zangeneh Nazanin · Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) · 2017
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries development Hydrophilic resin-based fissure sealant vs Hydrophobic resin-based fissure sealant · Follow-up mean 12 months | OR 0.809 [0.345, 1.896] | 8 studies · 1349 participants | Very low |
Caries development Hydrophilic resin-based fissure sealant vs Hydrophobic resin-based fissure sealant · 12 months | OR 0.490 [0.277, 0.867] | 6 studies | Very low |
Retention rate Hydrophilic resin-based fissure sealant vs Hydrophobic resin-based fissure sealant · 12 months | OR 0.859 [0.596, 1.237] | 6 studies | Very low |
Retention rate Hydrophilic resin-based fissure sealant vs Hydrophobic resin-based fissure sealant · Follow-up mean 12 months | OR 1.235 [0.566, 2.694] | 10 studies · 1597 participants | Very low |
1 including review in total.