Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Social capital and oral health: The association of social capital with edentulism and chewing ability in the rural elderly.
Kim et al. 2018 [51] 2018 · Kim Eun-Kyong, Jung Yun-Sook, Kim Kyung-Hee, et al. · Archives of gerontology and geriatrics · 2018
Included by
The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Cohabiting or married | OR 1.27 [0.49, 3.26] | 2 studies · 3295 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Living with others or married (cohabiting) · Cross-sectional | OR 1.48 [1.13, 1.94] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Living with others or married (cohabiting) · Cross-sectional | OR 1.34 [1.02, 1.75] | 6 studies · 13190 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Living with others or married (cohabiting) · Cross-sectional | OR 1.56 [1.12, 2.16] | 3 studies · 4492 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Cohabiting or married | OR 1.56 [1.12, 2.16] | 3 studies · 4492 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Living with others or married (cohabiting) · Cross-sectional | OR 1.15 [0.77, 1.72] | 3 studies · 8698 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low structural social support (living alone or unmarried) vs Cohabiting or married | OR 1.45 [1.14, 1.86] | 5 studies · 7787 participants | GRADE not reported |
Edentulism Low functional social support vs High functional social support · Cross-sectional | OR 1.21 [1.15, 1.27] | 2 studies · 1075 participants | GRADE not reported |
2 including reviews in total.