Primary study · included by 1 review

Effect of a Baby-Led Approach to Complementary Feeding on Infant Growth and Overweight: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Taylor 2017 · Taylor Rachael W, Williams Sheila M, Fangupo Louise J, et al. · JAMA pediatrics · 2017

PubMed 28692728 doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1284Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Taylor 2017 · References / Results

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Choking events BLW/BLISS vs Traditional complementary feeding (TCF) · during complementary feeding	no estimate extracted	6 studies	Ungraded
Overweight/obesity risk Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS) vs Traditional complementary feeding (TCF) · Follow-up to 24 months	RR 0.15 [0.00, 17.79]	2 studies · 457 participants	Low

1 including review in total.