evidence/gaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Evaluation of the Cariogram for root caries prediction.

Hayes 2017 · Hayes M, Da Mata C, McKenna G, et al. · Journal of dentistry · 2017

PubMed 28456556doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.010Journal Article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Multivariable prediction models of caries increment: a systematic review and critical appraisal.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2023 · cited as Hayes 2017 · Table 1 & Table 2 [33]; model validation, root caries; Cariogram validation (Fig. 6, P3-O1)
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Predictive performance for root caries increment (negative likelihood ratio, LR-)
Multivariable prediction model of caries increment (>=3 predictors), e.g. logistic-regression or algorithm-based caries-risk models vs Alternative prediction model(s) within the same study, or no formal comparator (models compared descriptively; no between-model statistical test) · Follow-up >=1 year (included studies 1-5 years)
No meta-analysis. Hayes 2017 [33] (5 Cariogram root-caries models): per-model LR- (Table 2) ranged 0.34-0.41; none reached the useful rule-out threshold of <=0.20.1 studyUngraded
Predictive performance for root caries increment (positive likelihood ratio, LR+)
Multivariable prediction model of caries increment (>=3 predictors), e.g. logistic-regression or algorithm-based caries-risk models vs Alternative prediction model(s) within the same study, or no formal comparator (models compared descriptively; no between-model statistical test) · Follow-up >=1 year (included studies 1-5 years)
No meta-analysis. Only one root-caries validation study (Hayes 2017 [33], 5 Cariogram models); per-model LR+ (Table 2) ranged 1.88-2.78 (best when mutans streptococci omitted).1 studyUngraded

1 including review in total.