Primary study · included by 1 review
Rate of intrusion of maxillary incisors in Class II Div 1 malocclusion using skeletal anchorage device and Connecticut intrusion arch.
Kumar 2017 · Kumar Prasanna, Datana Sanjeev, Londhe S M, et al. · Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2017
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Amount of incisor intrusion Maxillary incisor intrusion with temporary anchorage devices (TADs/mini-implants) vs Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA) | SMD -1.02 [-1.79, -0.24] | 3 studies · 92 participants | GRADE not reported |
Amount of incisor intrusion Maxillary incisor intrusion with temporary anchorage devices (TADs/mini-implants) vs Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA) | SMD -0.88 [-1.35, -0.42] | 5 studies · 136 participants | Low |
Rate of intrusion Maxillary incisor intrusion with temporary anchorage devices (TADs/mini-implants) vs Connecticut intrusion arch (CTA) | SMD 1.18 [0.22, 2.14] | 2 studies · 50 participants | Very low |
1 including review in total.