Primary study · included by 1 review

Capping carious exposures in adults: a randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide.

Kundzina 2017 · Kundzina R, Stangvaltaite L, Eriksen H M, et al. · International endodontic journal · 2017

PubMed 27891629doi:10.1111/iej.12719Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Clinical and radiographic success
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · 36 months
OR 2.34 [1.43, 3.84]2 studies · 379 participantsUngraded
Clinical and radiographic success
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · 12 months
OR 4.44 [1.63, 12.07]3 studies · 174 participantsUngraded
Clinical and radiographic success
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH) · >=12 months
OR 2.68 [1.7, 4.22]5 studies · 552 participantsModerate

1 including review in total.