Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Prevalence, and early childhood caries risk indicators in preschool children in suburban Nigeria.

Folayan, 2015 · Folayan Morenike O, Kolawole Kikelomo A, Oziegbe Elizabeth O, et al. · BMC oral health · 2015

Included by

Prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Folayan, 2015 · Table 2 (included studies); Table 3 (meta-analysis studies); ref 53

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.19 [0.14, 0.25]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Pooled logit prevalence -1.74 [-1.95, -1.53]	35 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.25]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.22 [0.17, 0.26]	42 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]	35 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.27]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None	Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]	34 studies	GRADE not reported

Oral hygiene practices and dental caries experience in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Folayan 2015 · Table 2; References 4-7, 15, 18, 47-65

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.