Primary study · included by 1 review

Lower first permanent molars: developing better predictors of spontaneous space closure.

Teo et al. 2015 · Teo Terry Kuo-Yih, Ashley Paul Francis, Derrick Donald · European journal of orthodontics · 2016

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Teo et al. 2015 · Table 1; Table 2; References [17]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Post-extraction space (spontaneous space closure / decrease in space)
Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side
Spontaneous space closure ranged from 45.5% to 85.2% overall (maxilla 33.3% to 94%, mandible 50% to 75%). Table 3 conclusion: early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space (Category III…6 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.