Primary study · included by 1 review

Oral health status and oral impacts on quality of life in early adolescent cleft patients.

Pisek 2014 · Pisek Araya, Pitiphat Waranuch, Chowchuen Bowornsilp, et al. · Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet · 2014

PubMed 25816532Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Oral health in patients with cleft lip and palate: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of periodontal and dental disease and oral microbiota (part 1).

Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2025 · cited as Pisek 2014 · Table 1; Fig. 6 (PI, cleft vs controls)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Gingival Index (GI) Orofacial cleft (cleft lip and/or palate) as exposure vs Healthy controls without cleft	MD 0.15 [0.11, 0.19]	4 studies · 488 participants	Low
Plaque Index (PI) Unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) vs Bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP)	MD -0.13 [-0.38, 0.12]	2 studies · 117 participants	Ungraded
Plaque Index (PI) Orofacial cleft (cleft lip and/or palate) as exposure vs Healthy controls without cleft	MD 0.29 [0.24, 0.34]	6 studies · 1618 participants	Low

1 including review in total.