Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Prevalence of dental caries and oral hygiene status of a screened population in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Olabisi, 2015 · Olabisi Arigbede Abiodun, Udo Umanah Ayamma, Ehimen Ukegheson Gabriel, et al. · Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry · 2015

Included by

Prevalence of dental caries in the primary, mixed and permanent dentitions in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · prognostic · 2026 · cited as Olabisi 2015 · Table 2 (included studies); Table 3 (meta-analysis studies); ref 64
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.19 [0.14, 0.25]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Pooled logit prevalence -1.74 [-1.95, -1.53]35 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.25]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.22 [0.17, 0.26]42 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]35 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.17 [0.14, 0.21]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.21 [0.15, 0.27]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.15, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Prevalence of dental caries
Not applicable (prevalence study) vs None
Prevalence (proportion) 0.20 [0.14, 0.26]34 studiesGRADE not reported
Oral hygiene practices and dental caries experience in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Olabisi 2015 · Table 2; References 4-7, 15, 18, 47-65

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.