Primary study · included by 1 review

[Changes in the dental arch due to obligatory early extraction of first permanent molars].

Telli and Aytan 1989 · Telli A E, Aytan S · Turk ortodonti dergisi : Ortodonti Derneg'nin resmi yayin organidir = Turkish journal of orthodontics · 1989

PubMed 2489135English Abstract; Journal Article

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Telli and Aytan 1989 · Table 1; Table 2; References [7]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Post-extraction space (spontaneous space closure / decrease in space) Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side	Spontaneous space closure ranged from 45.5% to 85.2% overall (maxilla 33.3% to 94%, mandible 50% to 75%). Table 3 conclusion: early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space (Category III…	6 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.