Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III.

Thiesen 2013 · Thiesen Guilherme, Pletsch Guilherme, Zastrow Michella Dinah, et al. · Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2013

Included by

Cranial Base Characteristics in Growing Patients With Class III Skeletal Pattern: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2026 · cited as Thiesen 2013 · Table 1; References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
SN length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.12 [-2.11, -0.12]3 studiesGRADE not reported
SN length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.59 [-2.69, -0.50]NRGRADE not reported
SBa length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -0.81 [-2.03, 0.40]3 studies · 289 participantsVery low
SN length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -0.94 [-2.27, 0.38]3 studies · 224 participantsVery low
NSBa angle (degrees)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.84 [-2.80, -0.89]5 studies · 481 participantsVery low
NSBa angle (degrees)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.87 [-2.89, -0.85]4 studiesGRADE not reported
SN length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.68 [-3.11, -0.25]NRGRADE not reported
SBa length (mm)
Skeletal Class III malocclusion (exposure) vs Skeletal Class I malocclusion
MD -1.56 [-2.88, -0.24]NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.