Primary study · included by 1 review
Pressuring and restrictive feeding styles influence infant feeding and size among a low-income African-American sample.
Thompson 2013 · Thompson Amanda L, Adair Linda S, Bentley Margaret E · Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2013
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Weight gain (restrictive vs coercive styles) Non-responsive complementary feeding (NRCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding (responsive/traditional CF) · Infancy to early childhood | Restrictive style would favor excess weight (three of five studies); coercive style (pressure to eat) would favor a lower weight (three of five studies); clinical significance never quantified. | NR | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.