Primary study · included by 1 review
Efficacy of 4% articaine hydrochloride and 2% lignocaine hydrochloride in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic reasons.
Hassan 2011 · Hassan Shahid, Rao B H Sripathi, Sequeria Joyce, et al. · Annals of maxillofacial surgery · 2011
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 8.2 [-4.76, 21.16] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -2.6 [-5.07, -0.12] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -1.81 [-2.85, -0.78] | 5 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -3.16 [-6.09, -0.23] | 7 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 27.34 [9.52, 45.16] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -2.38 [-3.43, -1.33] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -0.95 [-7.73, 5.84] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 18.68 [3.05, 34.30] | 7 studies · 476 participants | Moderate |
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -0.57 [-0.99, -0.16] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -4.41 [-7.62, -1.21] | 7 studies · 418 participants | Moderate |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -5.2 [-8.01, -2.38] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic onset time 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -1.34 [-2.21, -0.47] | 7 studies · 705 participants | Low |
Pain intensity (VAS) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -8.72 [-16.04, -1.4] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic duration (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD 10.02 [-3.71, 23.74] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -2.2 [-3.36, -1.03] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
Anesthetic onset time (min) 4% articaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia vs 2% lidocaine with epinephrine, infiltration anesthesia | MD -0.59 [-2.12, 0.95] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.