Primary study · included by 1 review
Partial caries removal in primary teeth: association of clinical parameters with microbiological status.
Lula 2011 · Lula E C O, Almeida L J S, Alves C M C, et al. · Caries research · 2011
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
total microbial load (log10 CFU) color contrast: black vs dark brown/light brown/yellow vs hardness contrast: soft vs medium/hard | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 59 participants | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | WMD -3.867 [-4.461, -2.874] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | WMD -4.446 [-5.241, -3.650] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | WMD -0.067 [-1.877, 1.743] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | Only one study (Beighton et al.) permitted this comparison: the mean log10 CFU difference was 2.32 for the colour contrast (black vs rest) versus 3.72 for the hardness contrast (soft vs medium/hard); hardness appeared… | 1 study | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | WMD -4.741 [-4.979, -4.502] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Discriminant power for caries severity: mean difference in log10 CFU (microbial load) between lesion categories Colour clinical examination (visual shade categorization: yellow, light brown, dark brown, black) vs Hardness clinical examination (tactile texture categorization: soft, medium/leathery, hard) | WMD -3.369 [-3.595, -3.143] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.