Primary study · included by 1 review

Does maternal feeding restriction lead to childhood obesity in a prospective cohort study?

Rifas-Shiman 2011 · Rifas-Shiman S L, Sherry B, Scanlon K, et al. · Archives of disease in childhood · 2011

PubMed 21081589 doi:10.1136/adc.2009.175240Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Complementary Feeding Caregivers' Practices and Growth, Risk of Overweight/Obesity, and Other Non-Communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Rifas-Shiman 2011 · References / Results

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Weight gain (restrictive vs coercive styles) Non-responsive complementary feeding (NRCF) vs Other models of complementary feeding (responsive/traditional CF) · Infancy to early childhood	Restrictive style would favor excess weight (three of five studies); coercive style (pressure to eat) would favor a lower weight (three of five studies); clinical significance never quantified.	NR	Ungraded

1 including review in total.