Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Personality measurements and ESP tests with cards and drawings.
Gonca 2024 · STUART C E, HUMPHREY B M · The Journal of parapsychology · 1947
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
HSROC summary sensitivity AI models (best model per study) applied to lateral cephalometric and/or hand-wrist radiographs to identify the pubertal growth spurt (three-class pre-spurt, spurt, post-spurt scheme) vs Reference staging by expert assessment (CVM, Fishman SMI, Grave and Brown, DRU or other validated standards) | Sensitivity (HSROC) 0.76 [0.70, 0.82] | 20 studies | GRADE not reported |
Bivariate pooled sensitivity AI models (best model per study) applied to lateral cephalometric and/or hand-wrist radiographs to identify the pubertal growth spurt (three-class pre-spurt, spurt, post-spurt scheme) vs Reference staging by expert assessment (CVM, Fishman SMI, Grave and Brown, DRU or other validated standards) | Sensitivity (bivariate) 0.86 [0.78, 0.91] | 20 studies · 3200 participants | GRADE not reported |
HSROC summary specificity AI models (best model per study) applied to lateral cephalometric and/or hand-wrist radiographs to identify the pubertal growth spurt (three-class pre-spurt, spurt, post-spurt scheme) vs Reference staging by expert assessment (CVM, Fishman SMI, Grave and Brown, DRU or other validated standards) | Specificity (HSROC) 0.88 [0.83, 0.91] | 20 studies | GRADE not reported |
Pooled accuracy AI models (best model per study) applied to lateral cephalometric and/or hand-wrist radiographs to identify the pubertal growth spurt (three-class pre-spurt, spurt, post-spurt scheme) vs Reference staging by expert assessment (CVM, Fishman SMI, Grave and Brown, DRU or other validated standards) | Accuracy (proportion) 0.83 [0.76, 0.89] | 21 studies | GRADE not reported |
Bivariate pooled specificity AI models (best model per study) applied to lateral cephalometric and/or hand-wrist radiographs to identify the pubertal growth spurt (three-class pre-spurt, spurt, post-spurt scheme) vs Reference staging by expert assessment (CVM, Fishman SMI, Grave and Brown, DRU or other validated standards) | Specificity (bivariate) 0.93 [0.90, 0.95] | 20 studies · 5071 participants | GRADE not reported |
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis prevalence · One month | Prevalence proportion 0.16 [0.12, 0.2] | 11 studies | GRADE not reported |
2 including reviews in total.