Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
Oba et al. 2009 · Oba Aylin Akbay, Dülgergil Turksel, Sönmez Işil Saroğlu, et al. · Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi · 2009
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 48 months | RR 0.62 [0.31, 1.21] | 2 studies · 1007 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 60 months | RR 0.29 [0.09, 0.95] | 2 studies · 205 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 36 months | RR 0.90 [0.49, 1.67] | 3 studies · 600 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 24 months | RR 1.36 [0.66, 2.78] | 4 studies · 1742 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.