Primary study · included by 1 review

Open flap debridement and guided tissue regeneration after 10 years in infrabony defects.

Nickles 2009 · Nickles Katrin, Ratka-Krüger Petra, Neukranz Eric, et al. · Journal of clinical periodontology · 2009

Included by

Long-term clinical benefits of periodontal interventions in strict supportive periodontal care: A systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Nickles 2009 · Reference 10; Table 1; Figures 2-3 meta-analyses
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · respective endpoints (10 to 20 years)
WMD -0.74 [-1.74, 0.26]3 studiesLow
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · baseline
WMD -0.03 [-0.44, 0.38]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · baseline
WMD 0.00 [-0.42, 0.41]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · 1 year
WMD -0.75 [-1.39, -0.12]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · 1 year
WMD -0.76 [-1.60, 0.09]3 studiesGRADE not reported
Probing pocket depth (PPD)
Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in intrabony defects vs Open flap debridement (OFD) or access flap · respective endpoints (10 to 20 years)
WMD -0.40 [-1.22, 0.41]3 studiesLow

1 including review in total.