Primary study · included by 1 review
One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen 2009 · Yassen Ghaeth · Journal of dentistry for children (Chicago, Ill.) · 2009
PubMed 19619427Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Restoration survival High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · 1 year | Survival percentage 95 [91, 98] | 9 studies | Ungraded |
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years | Proportion 0.93 [0.91, 0.94] | 6 studies | Ungraded |
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years | Proportion 0.66 [0.13, 0.99] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year | Proportion 0.95 [0.91, 0.98] | 9 studies | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.