evidence/gaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Risks for early childhood caries analyzed by negative binomial models.

Thitasomakul et al. 2009 · Thitasomakul S, Piwat S, Thearmontree A, et al. · Journal of dental research · 2009

PubMed 19278984doi:10.1177/0022034508328629Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Sugar consumption and early childhood caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2025 · cited as Thitasomakul et al. 2009 · Table 2; Table 3; Reference 22 (narrative only; not in meta-analysis)
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Early childhood caries (ECC)
Sugar consumption (higher sugar intake) vs No sugar consumption (lower/no intake) · Outcome (ECC) assessed from 9 months to 5 years of age
OR 1.59 [1.50, 1.68]9 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.