Primary study · included by 1 review

Clinical evaluation of four different dental restorative materials: one-year results.

Daou 2008 · Daou Maha H, Tavernier Bruno, Meyer Jean-Marc · Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia · 2008

PubMed 18491670Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Daou 2008 · Reference [77]; Figure 8 (paired meta-analysis, deciduous 1 year, subgroup CIVMR)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Secondary caries (occurrence) Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) vs Resin composite (RC) · 1 year of follow-up	RR 1.03 [0.07, 15.81]	1 study · 71 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.