Primary study · included by 1 review

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.

Bernardo 2007 · Bernardo Mario, Luis Henrique, Martin Michael D, et al. · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2007

PubMed 17545266doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Failure Risk of Composite Resin and Amalgam Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Bernardo 2007 · Table 2; Reference 24

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

1 including review in total.