evidence/gaps
Primary study · included by 4 reviews

A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months.

Ersin et al. 2006 · Ersin Nazan Kocatas, Candan Umit, Aykut Arzu, et al. · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2006

PubMed 17082278doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0087Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Ersin et al. 2006 · Tables 2, 3 (primary teeth); Ref [80]

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Scientific evidence for the management of dentin caries lesions in pediatric dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Ersin 2006 · Table 1; Table 2; Reference 29 (occlusal + occlusoproximal ART vs CRT-resin composite; occlusal NMA Fig 4 and occlusoproximal NMA Fig 5)
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Treatment success rate
Conventional restorative treatment with compomer vs Other network treatments · Various follow-up times
RANK 15 studiesLow
Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Ersin 2006 · Reference [42]; included studies (qualitative synthesis)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Ersin 2006 · Table 3 (characteristics of included studies); reference 50

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

4 including reviews in total.