Primary study · included by 1 review

An assessment of deprivation as a factor in the delays in presentation, diagnosis and treatment in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Rogers 2007 · Rogers S N, Pabla R, McSorley A, et al. · Oral oncology · 2007

Included by

Patient and System Barriers to Early Diagnosis of Oral Cancer in the UK.
Non-Cochrane · other · 2026 · cited as Rogers 2007 · Figs. 2 to 6; Fig. 10
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Proportion of dentist referrals with professional delay
Referral by dentists
Proportion 0.33 [0.29, 0.38]6 studies · 371 participantsGRADE not reported
Relative risk of referral by GPs compared with dentists
Referral by general practitioners (GP) vs Referral by dentists
RR 1.27 [0.96, 1.68]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of GP referrals with professional delay
Referral by general practitioners (GP)
Proportion 0.35 [0.31, 0.39]6 studies · 520 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of oral cancer referrals made by dentists
Referral by dentists
Proportion 0.38 [0.36, 0.41]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of oral cancer referrals made by GPs
Referral by general practitioners (GP)
Proportion 0.49 [0.40, 0.59]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of oral cancer referrals made by GPs
Referral by general practitioners (GP)
Proportion 0.49 [0.47, 0.51]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of dentist referrals with professional delay
Referral by dentists
Proportion 0.29 [0.16, 0.47]6 studies · 371 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of GP referrals with professional delay
Referral by general practitioners (GP)
Proportion 0.36 [0.24, 0.50]6 studies · 520 participantsGRADE not reported
Relative risk of referral by GPs compared with dentists
Referral by general practitioners (GP) vs Referral by dentists
RR 1.28 [1.18, 1.38]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported
Proportion of oral cancer referrals made by dentists
Referral by dentists
Proportion 0.38 [0.31, 0.46]9 studies · 1676 participantsGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.