Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in young permanent teeth (apexogenesis).
El-Meligy 2006 · El-Meligy Omar A S, Avery David R · Pediatric dentistry · 2006
PubMed 17036703Comparative Study; Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical and radiographic success Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy dressing vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · 6 months | RR 1.00 [0.94, 1.06] | 2 studies · 109 participants | Ungraded |
Clinical and radiographic success Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy dressing vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · 12 months | RR 1.04 [0.96, 1.13] | 2 studies · 109 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.