Primary study · included by 2 reviews
Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
Beiruti et al. 2006 · Beiruti N, Frencken J E, van't Hof M A, et al. · Caries research · 2006
PubMed 16352882doi:10.1159/000088907Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year | Proportion 1.00 [0.99, 1.00] | 4 studies | Ungraded |
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 4 years | Proportion 0.93 [0.91, 0.96] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years | Proportion 1.00 [0.98, 1.00] | 3 studies | Ungraded |
Sealant retention High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART sealants vs No comparator · 2 years | Survival percentage 82 [77, 86] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years | Proportion 0.97 [0.96, 0.98] | 3 studies | Ungraded |
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 5 years | Proportion 0.90 [0.85, 0.94] | 2 studies | Ungraded |
Caries-free sealed pits and fissures ART sealant using high-viscosity glass ionomer (press-finger technique) vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 6 years | Proportion 0.85 [0.79, 0.91] | 1 study | Ungraded |
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 48 months | RR 0.62 [0.31, 1.21] | 2 studies · 1007 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 60 months | RR 0.29 [0.09, 0.95] | 2 studies · 205 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 36 months | RR 0.90 [0.49, 1.67] | 3 studies · 600 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
Development of carious lesions on sealed occlusal pits and fissures High-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (HVGIC) fissure sealant placed by press-finger technique vs Resin-based fissure sealant · 24 months | RR 1.36 [0.66, 2.78] | 4 studies · 1742 evaluated sealed teeth participants | Ungraded |
2 including reviews in total.