Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.

Pascon 2006 · Pascon Fernanda Miori, Kantovitz Kamila Rosamilia, Caldo-Teixeira Angela Scarparo, et al. · Journal of dentistry · 2006

PubMed 16242232 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.08.003Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Pascon 2006 · Reference [53]; Figure 8 (paired meta-analysis, deciduous 1 year, subgroup Compomer)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Secondary caries (occurrence) Compomer vs Resin composite (RC) · 1 year of follow-up	RR 0.41 [0.02, 8.34]	2 studies · 250 participants	Ungraded

Clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations compared to composite restorations in pediatric dental treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Pascon 2006 · Table 3 (characteristics of included studies); reference 48

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.