Primary study · included by 1 review

Clinical experience with lingualplasty as part of the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea.

Woodson 1992 · Woodson B T, Fujita S · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 1992

Included by

Robotic versus non-robotic posterior midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Woodson 1992 · Supplementary Table 1; reference list; forest plots
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Oxygen nadir (minimum oxygen saturation), change
Non-robotic posterior midline glossectomy (coblation, laser, radiofrequency or conventional) vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; mean follow-up 13 months in non-robotic studies
MD 8.11 [5.06, 11.16]17 studiesGRADE not reported
Surgical success rate (Sher criteria)
Non-robotic posterior midline glossectomy (coblation, laser, radiofrequency or conventional) vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; mean follow-up 13 months in non-robotic studies
Proportion 0.57 [0.47, 0.69]13 studiesGRADE not reported
Oxygen nadir (minimum oxygen saturation), change
Posterior midline glossectomy, robotic and non-robotic combined vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; follow-up varied
MD 7.42 [5.16, 9.69]23 studiesGRADE not reported
Time to oral intake (days to diet)
Posterior midline glossectomy, robotic and non-robotic combined vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; follow-up varied
MEAN 4.04 [1.27, 6.82]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Respiratory disturbance index (RDI), change
Non-robotic posterior midline glossectomy (coblation, laser, radiofrequency or conventional) vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; mean follow-up 13 months in non-robotic studies
MD -33.94 [-41.31, -26.58]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Surgical success rate (Sher criteria)
Posterior midline glossectomy, robotic and non-robotic combined vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; follow-up varied
Proportion 0.61 [0.54, 0.69]22 studiesGRADE not reported
Snoring score (VAS), change
Posterior midline glossectomy, robotic and non-robotic combined vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; follow-up varied
MD -5.61 [-6.2, -5.01]10 studiesGRADE not reported
Time to oral intake (days to diet)
Non-robotic posterior midline glossectomy (coblation, laser, radiofrequency or conventional) vs None (single-arm pre/post change or absolute value) · Postoperative; mean follow-up 13 months in non-robotic studies
MEAN 4.72 [3.74, 5.7]2 studiesGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.