Primary study · included by 2 reviews

Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results.

Yu 2004 · Yu C, Gao X J, Deng D M, et al. · International dental journal · 2004

PubMed 15005472 doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2004.tb00251.xClinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Scientific evidence for the management of dentin caries lesions in pediatric dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Yu 2004 · Table 1; Table 2; Reference 31 (occlusal + occlusoproximal ART vs CRT-amalgam vs CRT-HVGIC; occlusal NMA Fig 4 and occlusoproximal NMA Fig 5)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Treatment success rate Conventional restorative treatment with compomer vs Other network treatments · Various follow-up times	RANK 1	5 studies	Low

Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2025 · cited as Yu 2004 · Table 1

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

2 including reviews in total.