Primary study · included by 2 reviews

One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth.

Louw et al. 2002 · Louw A J, Sarvan I, Chikte U M E, et al. · SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging · 2002

PubMed 12494713Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Louw et al. 2002 · Tables 2, 3 (primary teeth); Ref [77]

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Scientific evidence for the management of dentin caries lesions in pediatric dentistry: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2018 · cited as Louw 2002 · Table 1; Table 2; Reference 19 (occlusal + occlusoproximal ART vs CRT; occlusal NMA Fig 4 and occlusoproximal NMA Fig 5)
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Treatment success rate
Conventional restorative treatment with compomer vs Other network treatments · Various follow-up times
RANK 15 studiesLow

2 including reviews in total.