Primary study · included by 1 review

Clinical trial of a new glass ionomer for an atraumatic restorative treatment technique in class I restorations placed in Latvian school children.

Ziraps & Honkala 2002 · Ziraps Armands, Honkala Eino · Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2002

PubMed 12123116doi:10.1159/000057778Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Ziraps & Honkala 2002 · Table 4 (single-surface permanent teeth); Ref [82]
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years
Proportion 0.93 [0.89, 0.95]13 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 6 years
Proportion 0.72 [0.67, 0.76]2 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year
Proportion 0.96 [0.94, 0.97]15 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 5 years
Proportion 0.80 [0.76, 0.83]3 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 4 years
Proportion 0.86 [0.78, 0.93]3 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years
Proportion 0.85 [0.77, 0.91]6 studiesUngraded
Restoration survival
High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · 1 year
Survival percentage 96 [94, 97]15 studiesUngraded

1 including review in total.