Primary study · included by 1 review

Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.

Rahimtoola & Van Amerongen 2002 · Rahimtoola Salim, van Amerongen Evert · ASDC journal of dentistry for children · 2002

PubMed 12119808Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Rahimtoola & Van Amerongen 2002 · Table 4 (single-surface permanent teeth); Ref [19]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years	Proportion 0.93 [0.89, 0.95]	13 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 6 years	Proportion 0.72 [0.67, 0.76]	2 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year	Proportion 0.96 [0.94, 0.97]	15 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 5 years	Proportion 0.80 [0.76, 0.83]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 4 years	Proportion 0.86 [0.78, 0.93]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years	Proportion 0.85 [0.77, 0.91]	6 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · 1 year	Survival percentage 96 [94, 97]	15 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.