Primary study · included by 1 review

The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months.

Yip et al. 2002 (and Gao et al. 2003) · Yip Kevin H K, Smales Roger J, Gao Wei, et al. · Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2002

PubMed 12085859 doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0272Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Controlled Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Yip et al. 2002 (and Gao et al. 2003) · Table 4 (single-surface permanent teeth); one study, two reports [87, 88]; companion PMID 12674356

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years	Proportion 0.93 [0.89, 0.95]	13 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 6 years	Proportion 0.72 [0.67, 0.76]	2 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year	Proportion 0.96 [0.94, 0.97]	15 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 5 years	Proportion 0.80 [0.76, 0.83]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 4 years	Proportion 0.86 [0.78, 0.93]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years	Proportion 0.85 [0.77, 0.91]	6 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · 1 year	Survival percentage 96 [94, 97]	15 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.