Primary study · included by 1 review

Survival of Fuji IX ART fillings in permanent teeth of primary school children in Tanzania.

Kikwilu et al. 2001 · Kikwilu E N, Mandari G J, Honkala E · East African medical journal · 2001

PubMed 11921563 doi:10.4314/eamj.v78i8.8992Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2012 · cited as Kikwilu et al. 2001 · Table 4 (single-surface permanent teeth); Ref [85]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 2 years	Proportion 0.93 [0.89, 0.95]	13 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 6 years	Proportion 0.72 [0.67, 0.76]	2 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 1 year	Proportion 0.96 [0.94, 0.97]	15 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 5 years	Proportion 0.80 [0.76, 0.83]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 4 years	Proportion 0.86 [0.78, 0.93]	3 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival Single-surface ART restoration using high-viscosity glass ionomer vs None (single-arm survival proportion; no comparator) · 3 years	Proportion 0.85 [0.77, 0.91]	6 studies	Ungraded
Restoration survival High-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations vs No comparator · 1 year	Survival percentage 96 [94, 97]	15 studies	Ungraded

1 including review in total.