Primary study · included by 1 review

Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.

Attin 2001 · Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, et al. · American journal of dentistry · 2001

PubMed 11572292Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2023 · cited as Attin 2001 · Reference [56]; Figure 8 (paired meta-analysis, deciduous 1 year, subgroup Compomer)

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Secondary caries (occurrence) Compomer vs Resin composite (RC) · 1 year of follow-up	RR 0.41 [0.02, 8.34]	2 studies · 250 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.