Primary study · included by 1 review
Van As 2004
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density) Nd:YAG-based photobiomodulation (PBM) vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points) | MD 1.2 [1.0, 1.4] | 6 studies | Moderate |
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density) Nd:YAG-based photobiomodulation (PBM) vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points) | MD 0.95 [0.73, 1.17] | 6 studies | Moderate |
Alveolar ridge preservation (preserved bone volume) Nd:YAG-based photobiomodulation (PBM) after tooth extraction vs Passive healing or conventional mechanical debridement without laser · 8 to 12 weeks when several time points were reported | MD 1.2 [0.9, 1.45] | 6 studies | Moderate |
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density) Nd:YAG-based photobiomodulation (PBM) vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points) | MD 1.5 | NR | Moderate |
1 including review in total.