Primary study · included by 1 review

Vaghela 2017

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Infiltration and sealing for managing non-cavitated proximal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2021 · cited as Vaghela 2017 · Table 1a (infiltration); Table 2; Reference 57
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.21 [0.15, 0.30]11 studies · 549 participantsModerate
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.24 [0.08, 0.72]2 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.20 [0.10, 0.39]3 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.32 [0.01, 8.27]1 studyUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.14 [0.05, 0.37]2 studiesUngraded
Radiographic proximal caries lesion progression
Resin infiltration (Icon) vs Non-invasive treatment · Longest available follow-up
OR 0.38 [0.18, 0.81]1 studyUngraded

1 including review in total.