Primary study · included by 1 review

Taran et al. 2018

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Taran et al. 2018 · Table 2 (Included studies' characteristics); Reference [30]

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Crown retention Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 6 months	RR 1.02 [0.94, 1.11]	3 studies · 201 participants	Ungraded
Crown retention Prefabricated zirconia crowns (e.g., NuSmile, Zirkiz, Kinder Krown) vs Other crowns/restorations (stainless steel crowns, pre-veneered SSC, resin composite strip crowns, glass-fiber composite crowns) · 12 months	RR 1.00 [0.94, 1.05]	3 studies · 156 participants	Ungraded

1 including review in total.