Primary study · included by 1 review
Shakerian 2016
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient -0.67 [-1.64, 0.29] | NR | GRADE not reported |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean DMFT 1.64 [1.06, 2.23] | NR | GRADE not reported |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean DMFT 2.04 [1.70, 2.39] | 10 studies · 7463 participants | Very low |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Pooled mean DMFT 2.26 [1.83, 2.69] | NR | GRADE not reported |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient 0.75 [-0.22, 1.73] | NR | GRADE not reported |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient 0.61 [-0.08, 1.32] | NR | GRADE not reported |
DMFT index (decayed, missing, filled permanent teeth) None (single-group pooled mean; descriptive caries burden) vs None · 1992 to 2025 | Meta-regression coefficient -0.03 [-0.13, 0.05] | NR | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.