Primary study · included by 1 review

Reynolds 2020

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Laser-Assisted Strategies for Alveolar Bone Preservation After Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Reynolds 2020 · Figure 3; reference 34
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density)
Surgically applied Nd:YAG laser vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points)
MD 1.13 [0.9, 1.36]7 studiesModerate
Alveolar bone preservation (ridge height, width, volume or density)
Surgically applied Nd:YAG laser vs Conventional extraction or surgery without laser (standard care) · 8-12 weeks (interval selected when multiple time points)
MD 1.15 [0.88, 1.4]7 studiesModerate

1 including review in total.