Primary study · included by 1 review

Pavlin 2015

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Included by

Effectiveness of Physical Methods in Accelerating Upper Canine Retraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Pavlin 2015 · Table 3; Table 4; Figure 4/6

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Rate of upper canine retraction (mm/month) Vibration (AcceleDent device, identical protocol) vs Standard orthodontic canine retraction without acceleration · 2 to 7 months follow-up	MD 0.36 [0.28, 0.45]	2 studies · 77 participants	Moderate

1 including review in total.