evidence/gaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Olegario et al. 2020

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2022 · cited as Olegario et al. 2020 · Tables 3 and 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Restoration failure
HVGIC Fuji IX Gold Label vs HVGIC Vitro Molar and Maxxion R · 2 years
Annual failure rate (%) Fuji IX 14.7%; Vitro Molar 31.8%; Maxxion R 37.1%1 study · 150 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.